Arguing Euthanasia: An Ethical Study
Anthology : The Research ISSN: 2456–4397 RNI No.UPBIL/2016/68067
Vol-6* Issue-3* JUNE-2021
Paper Submission: 05/07/2021, Date of Acceptance: 15/07/2021, Date of Publication: 24/07/2021
Abstract
Life of a human being is undoubtedly valuable and every human
beings ultimate effort is to protect own life at any cost. But the situation is
not always same. Especially where the person is suffering from pain and
agony due to some incurable disease then life seems to be a curse to the
concern person. In such a situation sustaining life seems to be a great
problem and death seems to be the only option to get rid of such
situation. Quitting life by voluntary consent is termed as good death or
euthanasia in medical science. Euthanasia is nothing but a lawful act of
medical field for ending a person’s life. But if we focus more on the
characteristics of euthanasia we can find that euthanasia is not always
conducted on the voluntary consent of the ill person. Rather it is also
done where voluntary consent of the person is unavailable (i.e. Involuntary and Non-voluntary euthanasia). Now we can say that if it will be
permitted in law then the race of human being surely falls in great
danger. The concept of euthanasia is surely debatable. And here the key
question is “should law allow us to kill human beings for the sake of
moral obligation to relieving pain or providing good death”? Hence the
purpose of writing this paper is to examine the questions related to
euthanasia or good death. The moral aspect of euthanasia is also a
matter of discussion of this paper.
for full paper please visit below link :
http://www.socialresearchfoundation.com/upoadreserchpapers/7/437/2107301240411st%20suparna%20nandi%2014424.pdf
Comments
Post a Comment